Illustration based on image by Ā© enisakysoy / Thinkstock
At one level, the ideas and reality ofĀ sustainable development and liberal democracy overlapĀ and are interdependent. Common to both sustainable development and democracy isĀ inclusive and equitable participationĀ ā the ability of all people to come together and be involved in decisions about how we live and the goals we want to achieve as societies.
TheĀ justice,Ā legitimacyĀ andĀ transparencyĀ achieved by democratic contests and safeguards make the achievement of sustainable development fairer and accepted. TheĀ survival of democracyĀ will also be very difficult in an unequal, resource-constrained and overheated world. In other words, sustainable development itself is foundational to any democratic political system.
Any such discussion also has to take into account theĀ role and power of the economic systemĀ in creating problems and opportunities forĀ both sustainable development and democracy, as well as the increasedĀ complexityĀ andĀ uncertaintyĀ of the challenges facing humankind.
There are, however,Ā tensions between the two systems of ideas and practices which need to be resolved if current political democratic systems are to adapt in order to better tackle the challenges of sustainable development and meet the needs of future generations. You can find out more about some of these tensions in our briefing paper Exploring the tensions: The relationship between democracy and sustainable development. They are also set out in the table below:
| Existing liberal democracies | Sustainable development |
| Tendency to short-term thinking, activity and policy design |
Greater focus on long-term impacts, intergenerational equity and environmental stewardship. |
| Dominant ethos of individual freedom | Collaborative ethos |
| Competition between ideas and political parties ensures pluralism, with no single vision of the āgood lifeā or how to get there | Shared goals to co-ordinate activities over time |
| Primary focus on representative government with relatively limited public and stakeholder participation | Emphasis on more extensive public and stakeholder participation and collective decision-making |
| Defined political geographiesĀ andĀ legally defined citizens | Recognition that drivers and impactsĀ cross political geographies, time, andĀ levels of governance; affected parties include people inĀ other political jurisdictions, future generations and nature |
| Economic growth seen as measure of success and way to deliver improved quality of life for citizens | Pursuit of individual and societal wellbeing emphasised ā integrating economic, environmental and social considerations |
| Environmental limits not systematically taken into account | Environmental limits to economic and social activity |
| Decision-making divided into relatively discrete policy areas (such as health); use of socio-economic tools (eg cost-benefit analysis) for choice and resource allocation | Integrated and precautionary policy in recognition of complex and uncertain impacts and interactions; supported by multi-criteria decision-making tools |
This challenge is also part of the wider pressure on current models of democracy arising from the low levels of trust in democratic institutions and processes as well as increased political polarisation.
To more easily consider the innovations required, we can group parts of the overall challenge into several themes:
-
- Participation and accountabilityĀ to improve decisions, implementation, justice and legitimacy.
- Political institutions and policy-makingĀ that incorporateĀ sustainable development challenges andĀ the long-term, better integrate decision-making across specific policy areas, and appropriately value and incorporate options, risk and uncertainty.
- Constitutions, rights and lawĀ which embedĀ the long-term, nature, future generations and sustainable development principles.
- PromotingĀ culture, values and awarenessĀ that create supportive norms, understanding and collaboration.
- TheĀ roles of civil society and businessĀ in adapting, being part of, and innovatingĀ democracy to address sustainable development.
We also gather Ideas in ActionĀ which illustrate the different ways that people are addressing these challenges
We first looked at these issues in relation to climate change between 2009 and 2012. āThe Future of Democracy in the Face of Climate ChangeāĀ was a series of five papers which culminated in four future scenarios to 2050: transition democracy, post-authoritarian democracy, technocratic democracy and rationed democracy (based on two uncertainties: nature and availability of technology, and values prevalent in society).
Since then our thinking has further developed to incorporate the wider scope of environmental sustainability and socio-economic wellbeing, and particularly the needs of future generations.
